Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
10:04am Wednesday 25th November 2009
High Street banks have won their appeal over unauthorised overdraft charges.
The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the seven major banks and a building society, which had challenged High Court and Court of Appeal decisions that the charges come under "unfair contract" rules and are therefore subject to regulation by the Office of Fair Trading.
The result was awaited by tens of thousands of customers whose refund claims have been frozen while the test case went through the courts.
Handing down the unanimous ruling Lord Phillips, president of the Supreme Court, said: "It may be open to the Office of Fair Trading to assess the charge under other criteria."
Customers who go into unauthorised overdraft or breach their agreed limit can be charged as much as £35 or more for a single bounced payment.
Campaigners claim the actual cost to the banks could be as little as £2.50.
Should banks be able to charge what they want for unauthorised overdrafts?
If the banks had lost the test case, it could have cost them £2.6 billion a year in lost revenue and led to their having to make refunds of up to £1 billion.
Before refund claims were frozen, banks had already paid out more than £559 million to customers who complained about "rip-off" overdraft charges.
But many of the high street banks have already changed the structure of the fees they charge people who go into the red, with or without permission.
Lord Walker, one of the five Justices of the Supreme Court who heard the case, pointed out that the outcome of the appeal "may cause disappointment and indeed dismay to a very large number of bank customers who feel that they have been subjected to unfairly high charges in respect of unauthorised overdrafts".
But he said that as Lord Phillips had explained it was not the end of the matter and Parliament "may wish to consider the matter further".
The test case to decide the legal issues thrown up by the dispute was brought jointly by the OFT and Abbey, Barclays, Clydesdale, Halifax Bank of Scotland and Lloyds TSB - which are now part of the same group - HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland Group and Nationwide Building Society.
PaulMeUnder, Worcester says...
11:53am Wed 25 Nov 09
Pomygranit, St Johns says...
11:57am Wed 25 Nov 09
PaulMeUnder wrote:Could not agree more.
Don't go into your overdraft, be responsible with your money, have savings, live within your means.
There are other ways to avoid paying expensive bank charges, of course these ones require a degree of personal responsibility and don't rely on supreme court rulings in your favour!
Vigornian, Worcester says...
2:44pm Wed 25 Nov 09
jovialcommonsense, worcester says...
3:26pm Wed 25 Nov 09
Olga, Worcester says...
4:48pm Wed 25 Nov 09
jovialcommonsense, worcester says...
5:43pm Wed 25 Nov 09
consider_this, Worcester says...
11:47am Thu 26 Nov 09
drbeat, Kidderminster says...
7:04pm Thu 26 Nov 09
drbeat, Kidderminster says...
7:13pm Thu 26 Nov 09
JBLM2008, Worcester says...
1:10pm Mon 30 Nov 09
Add your comment
Register for a FREE Worcester News account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.
Please register now or sign in below to continue.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now In Worcestershire and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Worcestershire now!
Search Now »
Worcestershire homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Worcestershire
Search Now »
crowquill, Pershore says...
11:20am Wed 25 Nov 09
This whole country is now more corrupt than a banana republic.
The whole system is geared to screwing honest hardworking people.
I think we should all withdraw every penny we have from the banks and screw them!