Local RSS Feed


Minister rejects MP’s call on 25,500 homes


A WORCESTERSHIRE MP’s calls for the Government to abandon plans to build up to 25,500 new homes across the south of the county have been rejected.

Mid-Worcestershire MP Peter Luff asked the Communities and Local Government Secretary John Denham to tear up the West Midlands regional spatial strategy and allow local communities to decide on housing numbers.

The Conservative party has publicly said it would scrap the strategy if it won the general election, giving more decision-making power back to local councils. Labour, however, said scrapping the strategy would result in housing needs not being met and would also throw the construction industry into disarray.

During question time in the House of Commons last week, Mr Luff said: “Given the consensus that exists in areas such as south Worcestershire about the need for more homes, and for more affordable homes in particular, may I urge the Secretary of State, even at this late stage, to tear up the West Midlands regional spatial strategy and to allow local communities to decide exactly how many houses they need and precisely where they should go?”

In response, Mr Denham said: “It is important that the combination of local, regional and national policy should be used to secure sufficient homes to meet the needs of families in this country in the future.

“We have rejected calls to scrap regional spatial strategies and planning targets and to leave everything to decision-making at local level because we know that the house-building industry would grind to a halt, that land would not be available, that growth would be slowed and that the needs of this country’s families would not be met.

“The house-building industry is terrified by the prospect of such a policy being brought into play.”

Speaking afterwards, Mr Luff said: “This Government just doesn’t trust people – it prefers to impose the views of remote bureaucrats in regional organisation and Whitehall departments.

“People will be horrified to see this confirmation of contempt for their views.”

Comments(8)

economist says...
10:25am Sun 14 Mar 10

Well both the Halifax and Nationwide house price indexes show that house prices are falling again. House prices in the UK, including in Worcester, crashed by -20% from Autumn 2007 till Spring 2009. Last year, 2009, saw house prices rise a bit (about 8%) due to Gordon Brown using taxpayers money (£300 billion of it!!) to inject directly into the property market via the Special Liquidity Scheme (SLS) & the Credit Guarantee Scheme (CGS) in order to prop up house prices in order to bribe the electorate into voting him back into power come the General Election. However, the SLS and CGS £300bn has run out and house prices are falling again. The Bank of England has said the SLS and CGS will not be renewed and in fact the Banks need to repay the £300bn by 2012 and 2014 respectively. So, expect house prices to keep falling for the next few years and more than likely by 30% or more before they bottom out.
All the indicators are pointing to big house price falls to come. Note the 50% collapse in mortgage approvals in January this year.
The £300bn of taxpayers money should never have been used to prop up house prices - the money should have been used for saving health and education services, etc. and for loans to small businesses.

economist says...
10:38am Sun 14 Mar 10

House prices are falling again, including in Worcester, and will fall by at least -30% in order to return to their long term trend level. As noted above the crash in house prices that started in Autumn 2007 was only momentarily interrupted last year by Gordon Brown using £300bn of taxpayers money to prop up house prices to increase his chances of being re-elected irrespective of the damage it has added to the economy and ensured that the vast majority of people can't get on the property ladder, or if a mortgage holder, able to afford to move up the property ladder. Only major house price falls of 30% or more will resolve this problem and help the economy achieve real, sustainable recovery.
The £300bn did nothing to stop property sales from continuing to crash - including here in Worcester.
Look at the Land Registry data to see how many properties were sold in Worcester each year since 2006:

2006 - 2690 properties sold
2007 - 2179 sold
2008 - 1180 sold
2009 811 by the end of October so heading towards about 973 by year end
That is, Worcester had a 64% collapse/crash in the number of properties sold in 2009 compared to 2006.
It is a scandal that hundreds of people in Worcester have been taken in by Gordon Brown's £300bn bribe, and the spin and greedy actions of Estate Agents (who knew exactly what was going on according to the ones I talk to in Worcester and elsewhere), last year (and indeed now) into believing that the property market had recovered, that house prices had bottomed out and were going to keep going up when in fact the house price crash was interupted when it was less than half way through. People who bought last year will find that they have paid boom time prices, that their property will lose 30% or more value over the next few years - all to support Gordon Brown's political ambitions and fill the pockets of greedy, irresponsible Estate Agents.
If you get Estate Agents to 'talk off the record' they say they know big house price falls are coming and that they knew last years reprieve in the price crash was one huge Government created 'false dawn' that was never going to last.

big fish says...
12:12pm Sun 14 Mar 10

worcester cant need that many houses built, they want to try fillin the empty wch houses that are empty, i know of 2 that have been empty for almost 2 yrs...

skychip says...
1:27pm Sun 14 Mar 10

Worcester doesn't need anymore houses until all the infrastructure has been sorted out - the roads will be at gridlock if too thousands of houses are built - when there could be up to 3 cars in each household. Also schools and hospitals cannot cope - so feel all this should be looked at first.

keeneye says...
6:30pm Sun 14 Mar 10

Looks like we are back to the ring road again. Clr D Prodger has got his link road from Lowerwick to County Hall to get him to work.
And a new footbridge over Diglis right on his doorstep, to get him into the city, how convenient. Before we listen to our representatives who make the decsions on any road and housing stratergy in or around Worcester, they should declare what part of Worcester they live, then we might get a better understanding of why things happen or in most cases why they dont happen.

TimmyM says...
7:30pm Sun 14 Mar 10

We cannot expect to build 25,000 more homes without the local infrastructure to go with it - good transport links, schools, doctors surgeries, hospitals, waste disposal etc., and most importantly jobs. Where is the plan for these? To me it is just number crunching without proper provision for the 50,000 or so people plus their kids that will naturally want to live here. It has been the norm for housing to be built on demand at a relatively natural pace once the industry is there to support it.
Finally, why would Peter Luff ever expect this government to listen to him or the electorate in Worcestershire - once Gordon Brown got into power they all had earplugs surgically implanted so that they couldn't hear the views of the orginary man, let alone in if they live in Worcestershire! The only way this made centralised policy will be dumped is if they are kicked out.

Malvern says...
12:48pm Mon 15 Mar 10

Labour needs to build new homes to house the Labour voting immigrants they have been letting flood the country.

and678 says...
10:18pm Mon 15 Mar 10

"Mid-Worcestershire MP Peter Luff asked the Communities and Local Government Secretary John Denham to tear up the West Midlands regional spatial strategy and allow local communities to decide on housing numbers.

The Conservative party has publicly said it would scrap the strategy if it won the general election, giving more decision-making power back to local councils. Labour, however, said scrapping the strategy would result in housing needs not being met and would also throw the construction industry into disarray. "

That's another good reason to vote Conservative in may then!!!


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses