Local RSS Feed


Widow wins battle over potholes


A POTHOLED pavement is to be repaired outside a disabled widow’s home after she started legal proceedings against Worcestershire County Council.

Joyce Miller, aged 74, has felt imprisoned but the council initially “refused” to repair the pavement leading to her house in East Close, Wychbold, near Droitwich, because they said they could not afford to do the work.

Mrs Miller, who relies on a walking frame, has found it harder to get out and about to see her friends and go to bingo because of the number of bumps and cracks in the pavement caused by last winter’s big freeze. As a result, she instructed her solicitor to begin legal proceedings, claiming the council’s lack of action endangered her safety and well-being and infringed her human rights as she is unable to leave the house.

Mrs Miller, who had a mastectomy after being diagnosed with breast cancer in 1974 and has lived in East Close since 1982, said: “I just can’t get out. I’m an independent person and while there’s little I can do, what I can I like to do.

“I want to get out and feel like I’m living rather just existing.”

Mrs Miller, a retired office manager and press officer for the BBC, said the only way she can get out at the moment is by hiring a taxi which reverses up to her door. She said: “It’s the only means I can use to get to the shops or see someone. I don’t think this is acceptable.”

Mrs Miller’s husband Stuart, a former BBC radio engineer and parish councillor, died of cancer in March aged 76. Her son and grandchildren live in New Zealand and her sister in Spain.

She said that while she could get friends or neighbours to help her get out, she thought that was unfair on them.

Mrs Miller, who was a caretaker at the village hall for 20 years, while her husband was on the committee for 40, said: “Quite frankly, I don’t believe the council when it says it cannot afford to do these repairs.

“I have paid taxes all my working life and as the council has a legal duty to maintain pavements in good, safe order, I expect the money I have paid to be used for the purpose.”

Jon Fraser, Worcestershire County Council's customer and community manager, said: “Our inspectors went to have a look at the pavement without knowing Mrs Miller's particular needs and, quite correctly, decided that it was in good enough condition not to require intervention.

“Having now been given the full facts and given the exceptional circumstances of this case we have decided to apply a new top surface to that section of pavement which we hope will aid Mrs Miller’s access to the property.”

The pavement is due to be fixed by Monday.

Comments(14)

Lizzie R says...
8:15am Fri 3 Sep 10

I am confused by the County Council's response to this matter. Mrs Miller was told that repairs couldn't be carried out because there was no money, but Mr Jon Fraser said no repairs were carried out because the pavement was in a good enough condition, regardless of whether money was available or not.
But now they are going to repair the pavement, not because of money issues or the condition of the pavement, but because of Mrs Miller's circumstances.
It does beg the question whether the highways department know what they are doing, or what they say, and it doesn't instill any confidence in the public in the way the County Council look after our roads and pavements.
Apart from Mrs Miller's circumstances, was the pavement now deemed to be in a bad condition to require repairs and if so then why did the person who inspected the pavement say everything was ok? And what is the assessment process that determines if a pavement needs repairing or not as I know lots of areas in Worcester where pavements are in an awful state. Can Mr Fraser shed any light please?
My mother almost fell over because of the poor state of a pavement and still no repairs were carried out even though she reported the incident to the highways department.

jb says...
8:28am Fri 3 Sep 10

“Our inspectors went to have a look at the pavement without knowing Mrs Miller's particular needs and, quite correctly, decided that it was in good enough condition not to require intervention.
I would imagine that due to all the cost cutting going on that the criteria for assessing whether or not repairs are required has been 'revised'. As for putting a new top layer on it, does this mean they're going to shovel a load of tarmac on it that will wear away within a few months?

the-one-like says...
8:31am Fri 3 Sep 10

There's no evidence in this story of the council having said that it can't afford the repairs - where has that come from?Is the reporter just taking former press officer Mrs Miller's word for it? And how are all of the details of Mrs Miller's life relevant? This is one of the most biased reports I've read in a while - and I've read a few! Seems like Mrs Miller has our Worcester News wrapped around her little finger...

the-one-like says...
8:31am Fri 3 Sep 10

There's no evidence in this story of the council having said that it can't afford the repairs - where has that come from?Is the reporter just taking former press officer Mrs Miller's word for it? And how are all of the details of Mrs Miller's life relevant? This is one of the most biased reports I've read in a while - and I've read a few! Seems like Mrs Miller has our Worcester News wrapped around her little finger...

Tulstar says...
8:34am Fri 3 Sep 10

... "Jon Fraser, Worcestershire County Council's customer and community manager, said.....

“Having now been given the full facts and given the exceptional circumstances of this case we have decided to apply a new top surface to that section of pavement which we hope will aid Mrs Miller’s access to the property.”"..

Haha, Jon, don't make us laugh. The only reason you're putting a new top surface on is because you've been threatened with legal action and you don't have a foot to stand on. Don't give it the whole 'exceptional circumstances' bull****.

If Mrs Miller hadn't started legal proceedings against you lot, then you wouldn't have lifted another finger, would you? And don't pull the 'we can't afford it' nonsense either. Councillor Todger is quite happily spending millions of £'s of OUR money on completely pointless bus lanes which the majority of the public in Worcester don't even want. You can't go spending vast amounts of money on things like that, and then turn around and say you can't afford to scrape a bit of top coat off a pavement and stick a nice new one down!

If you want to raise some capital, Jon, start charging admission to County Hall - Everyone loves the circus!

F1Smasher says...
9:44am Fri 3 Sep 10

The highways department seem rather incompetent - they had to replace all the speed humps on Battenhall Road as they were illegal, according to a neighbour, they then supposedly wanted to replace them again because they weren't severe enough. There is something wrong with the way the highways department is run and that includes the people who fly about on motorbikes - it isn't clear what positive effect they have had since the Worcester News reported their commencement, as I see many defects on our roads on a daily basis.
.
I suggest people use sites such as www.fillthathole.org
.uk to report the hazards. If the council then fails to repair them and someone/a vehicle suffers damage as a result, they will be able to claim from the council. At the moment, the council can use a statutory defence which means they can ignore all highways defects unless reported or spotted by their inspectors. However, it's clear from the above website that the inspectors don't do a very good job, judging by the number of Worcester residents who log highway faults via the site.

Avante says...
10:32am Fri 3 Sep 10

Are you talking about the guy who rides around on the motorbike who has something to do with road safety? I had to get him to move his bike not long ago, he'd decided to park up on the entrance slip road to St. Martins Gate car park, on double yellow lines, totally blocking visibility for people trying to get out of the car park!!

I agree, what has her having a mastectomy 36 years ago, and her husband dying of cancer have to do with whether the pavement should be repaired or not?

This is good advice though to anyone struggling with the council, take legal action, it will always pay off, they will always back down. The Council, and indeed individual councillors cant afford to fight legal battles.

cheersforthat says...
1:35pm Fri 3 Sep 10

lmao

MrStJohns says...
1:44pm Fri 3 Sep 10

cheersforthat wrote:
lmao
Not as much as me ;-)

cmot1967 says...
1:48pm Fri 3 Sep 10

F1Smasher wrote:
The highways department seem rather incompetent - they had to replace all the speed humps on Battenhall Road as they were illegal, according to a neighbour, they then supposedly wanted to replace them again because they weren't severe enough. There is something wrong with the way the highways department is run and that includes the people who fly about on motorbikes - it isn't clear what positive effect they have had since the Worcester News reported their commencement, as I see many defects on our roads on a daily basis. . I suggest people use sites such as www.fillthathole.org .uk to report the hazards. If the council then fails to repair them and someone/a vehicle suffers damage as a result, they will be able to claim from the council. At the moment, the council can use a statutory defence which means they can ignore all highways defects unless reported or spotted by their inspectors. However, it's clear from the above website that the inspectors don't do a very good job, judging by the number of Worcester residents who log highway faults via the site.
Incompetent isn`t the word F1Smasher, that`s far too kind a word to sum up the highways department.

You`re right though about the council being to defend themselves. As long as they can show that they inspect roads and pavements regularly, they are covered by law, even if they choose to ignore defects and not repair repair them when they supposedly carry out their inspections.

If someone has damaged caused to a vehicle, or they injure themselves, because the roads and pavements haven`t been looked after, how about claiming against individual highway officers who clearly haven`t carried out their job properly rather that the council as a corporate entity? They`ll soon ensure things are sorted to avoid having a personal lawsuit.
By the way, customer and community manager! What is that all about? Sounds like another PR job creation post to keep someone uncessarily employed on a large salary. Why didn`t we get a statement from the highway engineers in charge instead of Mr Fraser?! Are they too scared or do they know they`ve dropped a clanger. Again!

molecat says...
5:25pm Fri 3 Sep 10

Did she actually start legal proceedings buy put an application into a court or did she merely can a solicitor to write a letter? Two very different things. A quick look on Google Streetview shows the pavement in East Close to be in not too bad condition, as far as I can see. However you view it it is certainly not in a condition to imprison someone in their own home. Interestingly when Google photographed it, Mrs Miller's drive appears to have a tarmac surface at the same level as the footpath. In the WN picture her drive now appears to be concrete and at a higher level than the footpath. I could be wrong and it may be just a trick of the light, but if it isn't I suggest Mrs Miller should pay to have her drive lowered rather than using tax payer's money to raise the footpath for her convenience.

molecat says...
5:30pm Fri 3 Sep 10

That's the worst sentence I've ever written at the start of that! It's been a long day and the brain is frazzled!
Should read "Did she actually start legal proceedings by putting an application into a court, or did she merely get her solicitor to write a letter to the council?".
Time to take a break!

DermotItis says...
11:26pm Fri 3 Sep 10

molecat wrote:
That's the worst sentence I've ever written at the start of that! It's been a long day and the brain is frazzled!
Should read "Did she actually start legal proceedings by putting an application into a court, or did she merely get her solicitor to write a letter to the council?".
Time to take a break!
I would suggest that the whole of your posting should be retracted.
Other photos have been released which show that the lady concerned was justified in her actions, whether it was a legal threat or the real thing.
Take a break and retract; your whole posting was not up to your normal standard.
When aged and on your own you don't have much influence, this lady has done what is necessary to get the job done in spite of the "Authorities" ignoring her.
Well done, I say.

molecat says...
12:54am Sat 4 Sep 10

DermotItis, I feel no need, whatsoever, to retract anything. Someone from the council, who I have no doubt knew their job, assessed the pavement surface and found it acceptable. It may not have been perfect, but, in an imperfect world, they felt it was adequate. Decisions regarding priorities have to be made and someone, somewhere, will no doubt disagree about those priorities.
I am genuinely interested to know if legal proceeding were actually started. Starting extremely expensive legal action against a council for a shoddy pavement, when no damage or injury has occurred is, at best, foolhardy. I expect the Worcester News’s involvement has more to do with the council’s change of heart than a solicitor’s letter.
Any of us, when approached about a little old lady who has suffered ill health and a recent bereavement would certainly want to help if we could, so it‘s hardly surprising the council are sorting this out. Not many public servants would want to appear in the local press as a heartless technocrat.
Both of my parents have difficulty walking now - and both are quite a bit younger than Mrs Millar, so I am well aware of the frustration she no doubt feels about the infirmity that old age inevitably brings. I know that kerbs, steps, steep slopes and pot holes can cause difficulties, but what do we do about it? Do we flatten every kerb? Do we install Stannah chairlifts on every footpath with a bit of a gradient on it? In an ideal world, yes; in the real world we can’t. The environment we live in is full of obstacles that will cause problems for the less able bodied; it’s an unfortunate fact of life.

It’s fantastic that Mrs Miller obviously likes to still get about, despite, as we see in the picture, apparently needing a Zimmer frame. Unfortunately many other older or disabled people are not former BBC press officers who have the know how to get the, sometimes rusty, cogs of authority moving in order to sort out the inconveniencies caused by their disabilities. Good luck to Mrs Miller, but there are less articulate and as well educated people out there in shoddy social housing who genuinely are imprisioned in their homes who don't get in the paper and don't get their problems sorted.


pavement: Joyce Miller said she couldn’t leave her home. PAVEMENT: Joyce Miller said she couldn’t leave her home.

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses