Local RSS Feed


BALLOT: Cameras in the crem

ON CAMERA?: Worcester crematorium (06298504) ON CAMERA?: Worcester crematorium (06298504) Buy this photo »

MOURNERS might get to watch the funerals of family and friends from the comfort of their own home by having the service streamed live over the internet.

High-definition webcams might be fixed in Worcester’s crematorium so people who cannot get to funerals can watch the service as it happens or at another time by downloading a file. The service would cost £40.

Talks between the city council and Wesley Music, a Kettering-based company which currently provides support for the crematorium’s audio equipment, are currently taking place.

The idea has the backing of the church as Roger Morris, Archdeacon of Worcester, said: “If it proved to help those that are grieving who aren’t able to make the funeral in person then it should be a good thing if managed properly.”

Ian Yates, parks and cemetries manager at Worcester City Council, said: “We already have the audio equipment in place so in theory all we need to do is add the camera. This may give people the chance to see the service. I’m not sure it’s for all people but it’s an option.”

Alan Jeffrey, one of the directors at Wesley Music which has installed the service in other crematoriums nationwide, said: “This is not a substitute for attending the chapel. It is for those who otherwise would be excluded from the service because they can’t get there.”

Mr Jeffrey said web broadcast services had become popular in the last three years – particularly for soldiers fighting in war zones.

Mr Jeffrey said the main mourning party would be issued with the security details a couple of days before the service which they could pass on to those wishing to watch.

During the service, the cameras – one providing a general view and another focused on the speaker – are operated with buttons.

As well as being streamed live, the service can stay online for seven days. It is taken down once the main mourning party says so.

Mr Jeffrey said: “It’s all very secure and very private. We are very careful. If ever there was any abuse, we would put measures in place to deal with that.”

If Worcester City Council decides to install the system it could be up and running in the summer.

• What do you think? Share your thoughts below.

Comments(6)

jb says...
11:23am Tue 22 Feb 11

I can appreciate that there are many people who would be upset at missing a funeral through ill health or being abroad and may use this facility but there may be many mourners at the funeral who would be very uncomfortable about the possibility of them being filmed.
Also I would say it should all be privately funded as during these times of hardship with council cuts I would be furious if the council had to pay anything towards what is an option which would benefit a small section of the community.

Maggie Would says...
12:32pm Tue 22 Feb 11

I suggest someone finds the money to replace the grotty finishes and grubby suspended ceilings instead.
The interior of the building is a disgrace compared to some of the lovely crematoria in Birmingham. The council can't do much about the design cheaply, but they could at least tart it up a bit.

pixie123 says...
10:00pm Tue 22 Feb 11

i think it is one of the worse things i have ever heard filming a funeral what ever next its one of the worse times in anybodys life they have to experience yet they want to film it.What about these sicko's who get there kicks from death this opens a door for them to watch it first hand well i for 1 will never approve of this sick project and i bet im not alone

davidpdavies says...
1:11pm Wed 23 Feb 11

What is the world coming to, I think that this is a sick idea to broadcast a funeral over the internet. A funeral is a time when we say goodbye to loved ones for the last time.The broadcasting of such an event will be abused at some point by those who will think that there is a demand for this morbid type of media.
If you have respect for a loved one, make the effort to attend their funeral and share the grief with others.

Piccolo says...
6:17pm Mon 28 Feb 11

Have to say that I really don't understand why anyone should be opposed to this idea. It's entirely optional, and all about giving families a choice; no-one bereaved has to have this; if the family want it they can, if they don't want it they don't. I would have thought it a great comfort to wider family & friends unable to be present in person due to distance, health, weather, etc.

Jabbadad says...
1:22pm Sat 25 Feb 12

Quite agree Piccolo.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree