Inquiry launched into George Lord sex case

SHAMED: George Lord SHAMED: George Lord

AN independent inquiry is to be held into complaints that Worcestershire County Council failed to properly support the young woman who made allegations of sexual assault against its disgraced former leader.

Dr George Lord was found guilty of sexually assaulting a council employee at a trial in January.

Now the council’s chief executive Trish Haines says an independently chaired inquiry will take place into how the situation was managed.

It follows calls from the father of Lord’s victim, who has requested an investigation into how his daughter was treated and supported following the assault.

She was just 19 years old when Lord assaulted her at County Hall in Worcester in 2010.

It has later emerged that hers was one of five complaints made against the former leader.

Her father has since accused the council’s HR department of failing to support his daughter, saying she felt ‘let down’ – an allegation the council denies.

“I feel the only way forward for our family would be for an independent inquiry,” said the dad.

He also criticised Coun Adrian Hardman, who succeeded Lord as council leader, for saying the case would “never have seen the light of day” 30 years ago.

In a statement released yesterday, Mrs Haines said: “Robust internal procedures are crucial to the county council’s business.

“While we are confident the situation was managed appropriately from the outset, we welcome the opportunity for third-party insight and would take any possible recommendations on board.

“I am already currently in the process of setting up an internal investigation into the processes followed and this will be chaired independently.

"We hope this voluntary measure underlines our commitment to employee welfare.”

However, the council is refusing calls from Labour group leader Coun Peter MacDonald for an independent inquiry into how they handled the allegations against Lord.

“Within just 10 days of the incident, an internal investigation had taken place and George Lord had resigned from the county council,” said Mrs Haines. “There is no value in another investigation to investigate the first investigation.”

Coun MacDonald said: “I believe most county councillors are ashamed to be associated with the county council when this could have happened to people. We must see why it happened and make sure it can never happen again.”

After being found guilty of the sexual assault in January, Lord admitted three indecent assaults against an underage girl between September 1977 and September 1979.

He remains in custody and awaits sentencing.

Comments(7)

Ex-Worcester boy says...
11:13am Tue 20 Mar 12

There are several victims we are now aware, how many more who did not or felt could not complain. Call me cynical but a independant inquiry will not give answers to why this man remained in position for far to long. People tend to know who they are working with and people working with this man by default are covering for this man. The man is a total disgrace and so are others who turned a blind eye.

brooksider says...
11:16am Tue 20 Mar 12

Surely the Inquiry should cover how George Lord was able to sexually harass Council staff in their workplace, what systems are in place to prevent a repetition and the public comments regarding the assaults by Mr Hardman and Ms Haines.
Words like 'alleged' and 'on the lower scale' do not seem appropriate.

bigrat says...
12:51pm Tue 20 Mar 12

Coun Hardman needs to be brought to book for his disgraceful comments when the allegations initially came to light. To say that they were “absolutely at the lower end of the scale” was outrageous and then to try and later defend his comments as a statement of fact was deplorable. Hopefully the independent investigation will ask Coun Hardman exactly what facts he was in possession of when he made these comments.

Jannus says...
1:01pm Tue 20 Mar 12

One of my partners colleagues registered a formal complaint against Dr Lewd, after being 'advised' not to pursue it. She was made redundant after 15 years service shortly after, going from a well paid career position to working at a bakers in Droitwich. County Hall H.R. only ever gave a reference stating her period of employment and sickness record, making it impossible to get a decent job.

Too little too late, if there has been any more cover ups like this they should be investigated to ensure it cannot happen again.

WilkoJ says...
6:57pm Tue 20 Mar 12

I wonder about the conduct of all council staff and I believe that any independant investigation should look and the morales and conduct of all officers and councillors as, supposedly, we entrust these people to deliver services and set an example.

CJH says...
7:49pm Tue 20 Mar 12

WilkoJ wrote:
I wonder about the conduct of all council staff and I believe that any independant investigation should look and the morales and conduct of all officers and councillors as, supposedly, we entrust these people to deliver services and set an example.
For goodness sake don't start associating all council staff with the behaviour of one person, especially concerning the nature of Lord's offence.

Socka19 says...
10:52pm Fri 6 Apr 12

I worked for WCC during George Lord's leadership and it was not uncommon to see him escorting a young female staff member around county hall, including the council chamber. The fact that he apparently liked the company of young women, usually on a one to one basis, was a 'standing joke' amongst my colleagues (obviously joking about this is incredibly inappropriate but the seriousness of his crimes were not known at the time). I find it hard to believe that the brave lady who testified against Lord was the only WCC staff victim, that people in authority were not aware of the risk that he posed and that there was no mitigation.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree