Taking the 'local' out of local government?

Worcester News: Taking the 'local' out of local government? Taking the 'local' out of local government?

CRUCIAL council services in the county could be moved to Staffordshire and Shropshire under controversial plans to make more cuts.

Services such as fostering and adoption are at risk of being shunted more than 50 miles away as part of a plan to save money.

Bosses at County Hall have agreed to team up with Shropshire Council and Staffordshire County Council to consider “common ideas” for cutbacks.

The Worcester News can reveal how five areas have already been looked at for savings, including: faster broadband, fostering and adoption, education services, IT and procurement, such as buying stationery.

Staffordshire County Council’s main base is 52 miles away at County Hall in Stafford, while Shropshire Council’s Shrewsbury headquarters is 53 miles away.

The Conservative cabinet at County Hall says this is just the “start” of the process.

The move has been labelled “disgraceful” by critics, who say they will oppose job losses.

Councillor Peter McDonald, leader of the opposition Labour group, said: “The only way you can really save money is by getting rid of people.

“We were elected to provide the best possible services for the people of Worcestershire, not to negate that responsibility and do deals with other councils.

"This is the end of local government as we know it. We’ve had enough cuts, it’s disgraceful.”

Councillor Alan Amos, a Labour backbencher, said: “This is a slippery slope – it’s outrageous, these places are miles away.”

Councillor Tom Wells, from the Liberal Democrats, said: “Many politicians know the price of everything but the value of nothing.”

Talks started between the leaders and chief executives of all three councils last year, and they have now agreed to meet every three months.

In between that time specialist staff will explore ways of saving money based on sharing services, as well as “reducing structural costs”.

For several years the county council has pioneered shared services with small district councils such as the Worcester-based HUB, which deals with public calls, and the benefits department.

But this is the first time bosses have announced a tie-up with larger shire authorities, or gone outside of Worcestershire.

The council is already looking to cut £90 million from spending by 2015, and wants to lose 857 posts, of which 300 have gone already.

Councillor Adrian Hardman, the leader, said: “We’ve got a history of sharing services with the districts but if we want to save more, we need to expand our range of partners to outside the county.

“I don’t think people mind who delivers a service, as long as it’s to a high standard.

“And I would not rule out looking beyond these two partners either.

“This will protect frontline services.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

1:05pm Mon 25 Jun 12

thompson9100 says...

This seems the way things are having to go across all public sector organisations. In some ways it makes sense to amalgamate back office e functions, as long as service delivery is not affected. West Mercia Police are currently undergoing a similar alliance with Warwickshire and it should result in better value for money, but as a public sector employee myself, it is ver

worrying for job security.

Tom seems to have missed this parallel in his article, which is poor really in my opinion, and the seemed lack of proof reading echoes the poor standard of this report.
This seems the way things are having to go across all public sector organisations. In some ways it makes sense to amalgamate back office e functions, as long as service delivery is not affected. West Mercia Police are currently undergoing a similar alliance with Warwickshire and it should result in better value for money, but as a public sector employee myself, it is ver worrying for job security. Tom seems to have missed this parallel in his article, which is poor really in my opinion, and the seemed lack of proof reading echoes the poor standard of this report. thompson9100

3:47pm Mon 25 Jun 12

Maggie Would says...

Did you proof read your comment, by any chance, thompson?
Did you proof read your comment, by any chance, thompson? Maggie Would

8:47pm Mon 25 Jun 12

Jabbadad says...

Whoever proof reads, this idea is ridiculas. Again we see the local knowledge and skills being sacrificed for money, which politicians are saying have to be saved. Why don't they act on the £Billions that the moneyed people / companies are squirreling away or by using crafty Tax experts are in fact evading the system. While those on PAYE have to pay every penny. The fact that the we-haves are able to shop / squander money on luxuries says nothing about our economy, but says a lot about an imbalance generally, or the fact that they are grossly overpaid. The huge sums paid by collectors for so called art do little if nothing for the working class, and without these workers the money makers with both feet in the executive troughs would have little or nothing. The counties finances should be adjusted steadily, but don't sell the family jewels, which don't belong to you councilors, you are but trustees, Act like trustees.
Whoever proof reads, this idea is ridiculas. Again we see the local knowledge and skills being sacrificed for money, which politicians are saying have to be saved. Why don't they act on the £Billions that the moneyed people / companies are squirreling away or by using crafty Tax experts are in fact evading the system. While those on PAYE have to pay every penny. The fact that the we-haves are able to shop / squander money on luxuries says nothing about our economy, but says a lot about an imbalance generally, or the fact that they are grossly overpaid. The huge sums paid by collectors for so called art do little if nothing for the working class, and without these workers the money makers with both feet in the executive troughs would have little or nothing. The counties finances should be adjusted steadily, but don't sell the family jewels, which don't belong to you councilors, you are but trustees, Act like trustees. Jabbadad

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree