Pupils ‘pay price of exam farce’ (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
Pupils ‘pay price of exam farce’
12:30pm Thursday 13th September 2012 in News
By Richard Vernalls, @rvernallsWN #worcsnews
ANGRY: Neil Morris.
HARD-WORKING pupils have missed out on college courses and apprenticeships as a direct result of the GCSE exams fiasco says a headteacher.
Neil Morris, headteacher of Christopher Whitehead Language College in St John’s, Worcester, says he has 22 pupils who have since left his school, whose futures were directly affected by the grade changes.
The national row first broke in August over how this summer’s English GCSE exam papers were marked, after it emerged the grade boundaries were changed – in at least one case it has now emerged – two weeks before the exams were due to be taken. The result, as we previously reported, was that a lower level of pupils got the five grade A* to C GCSEs which the Government uses to measure academic success across Britain.
Yesterday, MPs were set to grill education secretary Michael Gove for the first time over what has happened.
On Monday, the Welsh education minister ordered the re-marking of every Welsh pupils’ English paper.
That has led to calls for education secretary Michael Gove to follow suit, as it raises the spectre that Welsh pupils may now receive higher revised grades than pupils just over the border in England.
But Mr Gove says that decision could devalue Welsh pupils’ attainment against that of their English counterparts. Ofqual, the independent exam regulator, has launched an investigation and teaching unions have supported calls for the re-grading of all exam papers.
Mr Morris says the “unjust” grade changes have disenfranchised pupils. “I have one pupil predicted a B, who got a high D instead – and was on course to do A-levels, and is now having to do a re-sit to get his grade up,” he said.
“I’ve got two students who were going to take up apprenticeships, who now cannot because they didn’t get the required criteria.
“I’ve got students who have had to make key decisions about their future, based on this farce.”
He has since written to the parents at his school whose sons and daughters were affected. Meanwhile, Mr Morris said in an education system where exam results directly affect the outcomes of Ofsted inspections, the potential drop in GCSE attainment at other schools could put headteachers’ jobs at risk where schools fail to meet the floor standard required for exam results.
Comments(6)
MrsStJohns
says...
12:54pm Thu 13 Sep 12
What level do employers use in English if a student had a C in 2010 do they now class that as a D when comparing them with a students grade from 2012. Someone applying to be a teacher gets a D this year loses out to someone from last year who had a C, but their actual level of attainment is the same.
As with meany of Goves policies not fully thought out.
If they are going to change it let students do both years of their GCSE course knowing what they are going to be marked against not tinkering when kids are half way through.
It is unfair.
skychip
says...
3:15pm Thu 13 Sep 12
More Tea Vicar
says...
4:38pm Thu 13 Sep 12
That being said, the government does seem to have made a complete mess of this (as with so many other things, sadly enough).
Doogie 46
says...
5:58pm Thu 13 Sep 12
The only thing wrong with the current situation is that the standards seem to have been altered in mid-course rather than when the preparation starts.
From what I`ve seen of Michael Gove he is trying to bring much needed improvements in actual standards (rather than manufactured standards) that will take time and many battles to bear fruit.
I seem to remember recently that when a new type of exam (similar to the old O`levels) was proposed by Mr Gove, I think it was Mr Morris who said the old exams only taught you to absorb knowledge - isn`t that what passing exams is all about?
When I took my "GCE`s" in those far off days of 1962, we were told that our papers must be factual, legible and the language should be clear and concise - the examiner would not bother to try and decipher the paper, it would be thrown in the bin. And you passed or you failed - no grades. How would today`s students cope with that?
More Tea Vicar
says...
8:18am Fri 14 Sep 12
That's who the head looks like.
No offence to either the head, or Mr Kilroy-Silk.
I was just looking at the picture and thinking, who on earth does that look like?
More Tea Vicar
says...
8:44am Fri 14 Sep 12
They are trying to end grade inflation, which is right. I suspect many in the teaching profession are picking on the detail, but are actually more interested in halting grade and exam reform.
It seems to me that a return to the old system, where children spent their time learning, then took a challenging and strictly marked exam at the end, was better than what happens now.
Under the current system, they seem to spend so much time on assessments and doing modules etc, that they barely get time to learn or form an overview of the subject.
The old system wasn't perfect; you could get very lucky or unlucky with the questions, or just not be feeling too good on the day. But the current system seems much worse. A return to the old system with a few modifications would be better.
I suspect some teachers don't want it, as it might cast modern teaching in a poor light, and leave them with some explaining to do.
But they shouldn't be so defensive. Many teachers seem excellent. And even though I have concerns about grade inflation, I get the impression most of today's youth are well-educated, well-adjusted and genuinely likeable, implying that something has gone right at school.
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with