Hospital budget deficit £2.7m in only three months

A HOSPITAL deficit has grown to nearly £3 million only three months into the financial year.

However, NHS chiefs in Worcestershire say they can close the gap during the rest of the year and even move into surplus later in 2012/13 after breaking even last year.

Leaders at Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, which has a budget of about £330 million a year, has reported a £2.7 million deficit so far in 2012/13.

We reported last month how the deficit was £1.9 million, meaning it has grown by £800,000 in the last four weeks.

NHS chiefs who run Worcestershire Royal Hospital in Worcester say they had anticipated a deficit at this stage but admit the deficit is still £700,000 bigger than they had planned.

Finance director Chris Tidman spoke of his concern at a trust meeting at the Charles Hastings Education Centre at the hospital.

He said: “The original plan always assumed we would start with a deficit because our income has been reduced by four per cent. That has to come off every month but there was always going to be a deficit. The deficit we’re reporting is £2.7 million. That’s clearly a significant concern because we are behind where we thought we would be.”

Mr Tidman said reasons for the slippage against the planned deficit was that the trust was behind with its savings plans, which are £15 million for 2012/13. Bosses have reported a £1 million shortfall against the plan which Mr Tidman described as “disappointing”. He said if things continue the way they are going the trust will only save about £10 million – £5 million under target for the year.

Efforts are being made to turn the situation around, including the appointment of a new chief operating officer, Stewart Messer, to look into it.

The other pressure that has prevented the trust making savings is the 10 per cent increase in emergency demand above plan.

Mr Tidman said the increase in demand had placed hospitals under “incredible strain”.

He said: “We can’t underestimate the impact of that increase in demand on our services at a time when we need to be reducing our capacity and, in some cases, taking some beds out of the system.”

Comments(6)

Saturn V says...
12:37am Sun 29 Jul 12

"slippage against the planned deficit..."
My god it's worse than I thought - "slippage" lets hope we can turn a profit soon eh.

Ballymoss says...
8:31am Sun 29 Jul 12

More money should be spent on the NHS anyway instead of blowing over £9,000,000,000 on this farce of an Olympics!

Jabbadad says...
10:52am Sun 29 Jul 12

I agree and there will be some serious money earned by a few out of these Billions. Mostly going to London but we will all be paying for it over many years to come.
I clearly recall when we were awarded the Olympics, my heart sank at the thoughts of the huge debt for the Nation to bare, and we weren't aware of the looming crisis, since the then government were not listening to warnings about the Nations debt and what happens when you live off credit. there has to be a day of reckoning, and it's here.
Plus we will suffer for the huge PFI spending for 30 years and more , plus the cost of these Olympics. Fools Gold is inherent with Foolish Government.
Fine words from Cameron on the banks not lending to small businesses, but do we see any government action? No, since they are busy topping up the balances of the millionaires first. Their style of living has not gone down, but come the cold weather, the poor will again be having to make the choice whether to EAT or HEAT.
Out of interest I am not surprised over the huge increase in British Gas (sold to the French by Gordon Brown &Co) profits, for the last quarter, since coincidentally they stopped their £90 winter allowances to those in fuel poverty. Every Little Helps British Gas eh?

worcswolf says...
3:31pm Sun 29 Jul 12

The majority of the 9.4bn will be found by Londoners and central government along with sponsors and lottery money. This country use to build and innovate and lead. The Olympics is a spectacular event and we all should be proud that its being put on.
The NHS has enough taxpayers money going into it and its a fantastic institution that provides free care at the point of contact. the trust is confident it will pull it back but if it doesnt i am sure the hospital wont go bust some fat cat at the top will get sacked with a pay off. Their are a lot of people enjoying the Olympics and i am sure it will inspire thousands whilst generating money for the economy.
Its raining again today go and whinge about that and stop talking piffle.

Jabbadad says...
9:57am Mon 30 Jul 12

Talking piffle is when you don't recognise that huge amounts of the Billions for the Olympics are coming from all the Taxpayers, Londoners don't have a special Tax income, it comes out of the same pot. And they will also gain the most with new rail links and housing (which is to be welcomed)
Yes huge amounts have been raised from sponsors, but when the final figures are announced will be the time to see what is the worth and to who. Then we will see who is talking piffle.

More Tea Vicar says...
10:13am Tue 31 Jul 12

///Efforts are being made to turn the situation around, including the appointment of a new chief operating officer, Stewart Messer, to look into it. ///

That's a clue to the roots of the problem.The NHS already seems to have masses of layers of costly bureaucracy, contributing to the financial problems.

Any organisation worth its salt would be able to deal with its own problems, but this lot want to employ yet more managers,

Says all you need to know about the current staff, that they can't solve this themsselves.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree