Blow to county train users

TRAIN users across Worcestershire have been dealt a bitter blow – with hopes of an hourly service to London effectively scrapped until at least 2028.

The Government has started the hunt for a new provider to run the Cotswold Line, but has revealed it will not be asking for more frequent pick-ups.

At the moment commuters travelling from Worcester, Malvern or Evesham to the capital must use First Great Western’s services, which is one train every two hours at best.

The Department for Transport is calling for “broadly the same number of trains” to be in operation, infuriating the county’s MPs.

West Worcestershire MP Harriett Baldwin said: “These minimum service levels are well below what I think a successful bidder should achieve and I hope the short-listed firms will aim high.

“If there was a regular, reliable, hourly service from the area to London it would attract passengers that are currently being lost to Birmingham, Warwick, Newport and Swindon.”

The call for bidders to “aim high” was echoed by Mid-Worcestershire MP Peter Luff , who said: “I’m bitterly disappointed at this spectacular missed opportunity.

“We must have an hourly service, it is crucial to the county’s prosperity. It’s highly unlikely the tender document will be changed, all we can do now is put pressure on any bidders to voluntarily offer a better service and hope they win the contract.”

The Department for Transport’s tendering document states: “The new franchise will require broadly the same number of trains to run between end-to-end destinations as is the case today, while giving the operator greater flexibility over timetabling and station calls.”

It also insists the service offers “frequent journey opportunities”.

The department has short-listed four bidders, one of which is First Great Western, and will be selecting the winner to run the line from July 2013 to 2028.

The rival contenders will have to submit bids by October, with an announcement due in March next year.

First Great Western has just rolled out a raft of bigger trains on the route.

Comments(8)

outside-edge says...
4:49pm Sat 28 Jul 12

We get the message: If you want to get to London on a more frequent, quicker and on probably a more reliable service, for an extra fiver travel via Birmingham!

All that money wasted on doubling the track between Evesham and Moreton, and Worcester still gets a third rate service. Without the extra trains it's meaningless!

justsayin says...
6:10pm Sat 28 Jul 12

I gave up using this line last year to use the Brum/Euston line. Saves me 20 min door to door, often cheaper if I buy online and by far superior level of service and travelling experience. FGW needs to go!

John Herbert Smith says...
1:54pm Sun 29 Jul 12

Who on earth researched this article?
In the evening peak there are departures from London Paddington to Worcester at ...1622 1722 1750 1822 1922 1948... For the rest of the day it is hourly apart from a couple of two hour gaps.

How on earth is this "one train every two hours at best"? This newspaper is actively discouraging rail travel by writing nonsense about the timetable.

thesquirrel says...
11:50am Mon 30 Jul 12

In my humble opinion, frequency isn't the problem; the duration of the journey is. There are too many stops. This journey should be 2 hours maximum and ideally 1.5 hours. It currently takes 2.25 hours at best.

We need an express London service stopping at Oxford and Reading only.

Newspaper reader1982 says...
2:31pm Mon 30 Jul 12

John read the report properly. It is talking about services TO London, not from London.

John Herbert Smith says...
7:34pm Mon 30 Jul 12

Newspaper reader - what are you on about? Look at the timetable! How could there be more trains from London than from London. How would they get back!

There is a basic hourly service with a couple of gaps. At peak times, it is every half hour. I think I know what I'm talking about as I am a regular user!

Why has the article not been corrected yet?

I agree that the journey time is too long also. 2hrs should be achievable - it was in the 90s.

Newspaper reader1982 says...
9:55pm Mon 30 Jul 12

Well it depends where you're travelling from John, I use it via Evesham and can tell you that unless your very lucky it's close to one every two hours for most of the day same for Malvern too, trains often run late on top of that. Not a great service.
I see Peter Luff and Harriett Baldwin are quoted and their the MPs for Malvern and Evesham so id guess thats the whole point really. rather than Worcester as admittedly its less of an issue for Worcester.

John Herbert Smith says...
2:47pm Tue 31 Jul 12

Newspaper reader: Evesham has the same level of service as Worcester - you are still wrong. I suggest you read the timetable...

Malvern does have slightly less, but still much more than "one train every two hours at best".

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree