THE outcry over Wigan midfielder James McLean's decision not to wear a poppy on his shirt has been preposterous.

I can think of no other way of responding to the criticism that has come the Northern Irishman's way following the Championship match against Bolton.

For McLean to be abused for his decision not to wear one, a stance he has taken before, is ridiculous and totally unjust. He has even received death threats in the past.

Up until quite recently, the symbol was nowhere to be seen on a football shirt but now it is everywhere, and clubs often make a big play of it, too.

It is almost as if some PR edict has gone out, and woe betide anyone who defies it.

Similarly, you won't have been able to turn on a television in the last fortnight without seeing a presenter wearing one.

Now, let's get one thing clear. I am not against the poppy appeal - I wholly support it, took part in the launch this year at Worcester's Guildhall and feel it is my duty to wear one.

But, and here's the crunch, it is my choice to do so and mine alone. Just like it is McLean's not to, for reasons he has publicly stated with an open letter in the media.

By automatically attaching a poppy to the front of a player's shirt, or that of a television personality, that choice is being taken away.

I suspect the majority of people are quite happy to have one adorned on their clothing but, if not, they should not be made to feel as though they are obliged to do so.

We wear the poppy to remember those who gave their lives fighting for our freedom - the same freedom that is being denied McLean, whether we agree with his views or not.

His decision should be respected.