Sport RSS Feed


Win Worcester Warriors Aviva Premiership Match Tickets

Fears for City fans' safety as stadium crossing is ruled out


FOOTBALL fans will have to cross a dual-carriageway and dodge traffic travelling at 70mph to reach Worcester’s proposed new stadium.

Despite being alongside the busy bypass, no crossing is proposed for the new stadium, which will house Worcester City Football Club.

A pedestrian bridge over Nunnery Way has been deemed too expensive by developers and was not recommended by police on safety grounds.

Crossings, controlled by traffic lights, have also been ruled out by Worcestershire County Council as they would interrupt the flow of the road, which is subject to the national speed limit of 70mph.

Warndon parish councillor Ted Holloway raised concerns about the plans at a recent parish council meeting.

He said: “On match day where are all the people going to cross Nunnery Way? There are going to be bodies flying through the air. It is a prescription for mayhem.”

He also expressed concerns about car parking provision – the proposal has enough spaces for 220 cars - and vehicular access from the site.

Plans submitted to Worcester City Council are for a 6,000 capacity stadium (2,000 seats and 4,000 standing) with offices, off Nunnery Way.

There is also outline planning permission sought for a hotel, restaurant and three car showrooms as well as one for motorcycles on the site.

Vehicles will access the site off Nunnery Way and there will be a small slip-road for cars to get back on to the dual carriageway.

A survey showed one in four Worcester City fans travel to home games on foot. With this in mind, developers St Modwen propose a set of criteria aimed at encouraging walking and cycling and the promotion of public transport.

These include footpaths along both sides of the carriageway, numerous entry points into the stadium site and uncontrolled crossings at the roundabouts.

Plans also include a new bus stop along the A4440 and cycle routes.

Alan Coleman, the city council’s senior planning officer, said pedestrian and vehicle access is a key part of the proposal.

“They are one of the principal considerations of the application that will be looked at very carefully in full consultation with the highways department,” he said.

He revealed that planning officers had wanted a footbridge over the dual carriageway and suggested it could become the principal issue between the two parties.

“We were actively promoting this and it was ruled out by the applicant on cost grounds,” he said.

Julie Rossiter, senior asset manager at St. Modwen said: “We carefully considered the option of including a footbridge and took advice from the police who strongly recommended that we did not include this as part of our proposals.

“From experience they felt that people may not use it and it could therefore turn into a highways safety issue."

She added the application was submitted after detailed discussions with the Highways Authority and proposals included safe access.

“As a result, we are suggesting that an existing bridleway links up with a permissive route along the A4440 and into the Countryside Centre,” she said.

“From here, the route will join with an existing footpath through Swinesherd and into Nunnery Way - this has all been designed to enhance and improve upon the current connections to the site.”

When asked if Worcestershire County Council would consider lowering the speed limit, a spokesman said:"We have recently received the planning application from Worcester City Council. We will be looking at the application over the coming weeks so are unable at this stage to comment further."


Comments(11)

ranwor says...
9:28am Wed 11 Feb 09

How can not having a footbridge be safer than having one? Without one everyone has to cross the dangerous road. This defies logic.

High Time says...
10:08am Wed 11 Feb 09

ranwor wrote:
How can not having a footbridge be safer than having one? Without one everyone has to cross the dangerous road. This defies logic.
Ranwor. You are not a planner if you were you would know that logic is not a planning issue.

brooksider says...
10:08am Wed 11 Feb 09

Whilst it appears the local councils are doing everything in their power to prevent this move, the proposition that because 1 in 4 fans walk to St Georges Lane they have not provided aquedate visitor access for this site.
If the scheme does go ahead I can assure St Modwen I will not be walking from Claines to the new stadium!

Andrew Guy says...
10:28am Wed 11 Feb 09

Review the Nunnery Way planning application at www.worcester.gov.uk (ref P08Q0652)

Public consultation on this application remains open until 17 February 2009, so send your comments to:

Alan Coleman
Acting Head of Planning
Worcester City Council
Orchard House
Farrier Street
Worcester
WR1 3BB

or by e-mail to:
ACOLEMAN@worcester.g
ov.uk

Tp46 says...
10:36am Wed 11 Feb 09

It's a long way to walk to watch them loose !!!

Avante says...
12:46pm Wed 11 Feb 09

you have to get this into perspective, the planning application has been presented by St. modwen Developments, for development of a 20 acre site. 14.5 acres will be developed for mixed use including hotel, restaurant, car showrooms and offices, and 5.5 acres for a football ground. so pretty much 75% St. Modwen and 25% Worcester City Football Club. The plans have been put together to cater for the 75% that SMD make revenue out of, and that will be serviced by cars.
The football club? Do SMD really care? of course they don't! so long as they get their 14.5 acres of development off the back of the new football ground, thats all they need to worry about.

chris peacockpeacock says...
2:25pm Wed 11 Feb 09

city have been planning a move from the lane for as long as i can remember- i have seen reference to it in a program from over 20 years ago. When you have the powers that be who are for whatever reason inherently opposed to the progress of the football team it makes it impossible for them to function. You need only to look to the examples of Maidstone United and Wimbledon both of whom fell foul to councils who simply weren't prepared to meet them half way. I hope this happens but i really don't think it ever will. Judging by the huge dip in attendances down the lane the last couple of seasons i am not the only one.

Avante says...
5:57pm Wed 11 Feb 09

Chris - the council have allocated the land at Nunnery way for a football stadium for many years, if the football club presented an application for a football ground on the site in line with CLT32, then they'd have been there many years ago. The problem is that this land isn't allocated for retail or mixed use development, and the plan has not been submitted by the football club but by St. Modwen Developments, who want 75% of the site for a retail park, and 25% for a football ground, a ground far smaller than is required, and only there to satisfy their development needs.
The council have done all they could and more, its the fault of the football club for not presenting an acceptable aplication

Zoella says...
8:14pm Wed 11 Feb 09

i would like to flag up the point that i live in swinesherd. Me and My little bother attend pershore high school and have to cross the A4440 every morning during rush hour in order to catch a bus out side of the countryside centre, and have been doing so for the past 4 years. So far we are lucky to have not had any 'bodies flying.' But i will be leaving pershore at the end of this year and so my brother will have to walk it alone. I do not understand their reasoning for not having traffic lights, as they have them down in whittington where, by the way, the speed limit is also 70mph. Never mind the football fans, what about our students! bearing in mind, we are your future, and at this rate your future is doomed.

Beck says...
11:07pm Wed 11 Feb 09

Unbelievable! Are Worcester City so desperate that they will go along with any hair-brained scheme? A child was recently knocked down and seriously injured on London Road whilst trying to cross without a crossing in a 30 mph zone! I thought this was about football, not compromise. If the club had half a care for their fans or for their city, they would have shelved this particular scheme and saved themselves the aggro. They need to stop forget bleating on about people not wanting a ground - and sort out something fit for purpose.

wuster says...
1:24pm Sun 15 Feb 09

Once WCFC get their stadium, all of the land from Whittington (junction 7) to Sixways (junction 6) will be open to development, which then will make the link road have to have numerous traffic island's so that people will be able to get in to the new business's and housing along there. Probably get the speed limit reduced to 30mph, Traffic lights and a couple of speed cameras, it will be like the journey from Worcester to Kidderminster along the a449 !!!


DANGER: The road fans will have to cross. Picture by John Anyon. 06136801 STADIUM: An artist's impression.

DANGER: The road fans will have to cross. Picture by John Anyon. 06136801

STADIUM: An artist's impression.



Most popular


Get Adobe Flash player

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses