Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
8:00am Tuesday 7th September 2010 in
JUST 24 hours after unveiling revised plans, Worcester City have revealed they are at least £1.5 million short of building a new stadium at Nunnery Way.
City want to build a ground to Blue Square Bet North standard for £2m, which will feature a 556-seater main stand and a covered terrace.
However, the figures did not include land and infrastructure costs, which have been set by site owners St Modwen at £1.26m.
The developer wants £100,000 for each acre of the 5.75-acre site and another £660,000 to cover the infrastructure costs, which have to be paid on vacation of St George’s Lane in June 2013.
That takes the overall cost of the project to £3.266m — and City look set to have £1.75m at best once the Royal Bank of Scotland debt has been settled from the sale of the Lane.
It is an alarming funding gap and one which appears to leave the future of the scheme in jeopardy.
Club officials are working with St Modwen to address the shortfall — there is still hope of a profit-share from the enabling development — but admit it is tough.
Director Andrew Watson said: “There are three aspects to the project — the land, the infrastructure costs and the stadium itself.
“We are doing our very best to do it but we have got a stacked hand. It’s not easy and even with these figures we are not going to end up with very much. It won’t be special, it will be very basic.
“Clearly we understand that to get planning permission, the council are going to want to see how we are going to fund it and we are in detailed discussions with St Modwen.”
City are consulting a quantity surveyor to evaluate the drawings and costings which they hope could reduce the stadium cost by £500,000 but they still have to find the remaining money to build it.
There is also the issue of a pedestrian footbridge across the dual carrriageway, costing around £750,000 which remains a sticking point for both parties.
City are tied to a contract with St Modwen, allowing the Birmingham firm to keep their options open until 2017, which will only fail if there is no hope of planning permission being granted in that time.
Watson added: “The legal position is that it has to be financially sustainable.
“The business plan states that we need overage from St Modwen to fund the stadium costs.
“I don’t think the city council will give planning permission to a project that is not sustainable.”
• Get the latest City news and see how the league looks here.
Comments(9)
humbug66
says...
11:26am Tue 7 Sep 10
Andrew Guy
says...
3:37pm Tue 7 Sep 10
Avante
says...
4:57pm Tue 7 Sep 10
Andrew Guy
says...
6:54pm Tue 7 Sep 10
Avante
says...
7:58pm Tue 7 Sep 10
DermotItis
says...
10:47pm Tue 7 Sep 10
Avante
says...
8:40am Wed 8 Sep 10
brooksider
says...
9:27am Wed 8 Sep 10
Avante wrote:Dave Boddy was certainly out of his depth with the negotiations, both with Careys & St Modwen, but any agreement he made with SMD must have been run passed or approved by the project leader, David Hallmark.
They can't, the board is contractually obliged to work with SMD, and put every reasonable endeavour into the Nunnery Way plan. We have a situation where the contractual agreements are forcing the Directors to operate in a way that is detrimental to the business, that can't be right. However the cost of challenging contractual agreements could run into six figures! SMD have WCFC by the short and curlies, thanks to the amazing negotiating skills of David Boddy! The club is in total turmoil, and I personally would take the administration route, if only to break these contracts!
Wayne Henley
says...
8:31am Thu 9 Sep 10
brooksider wrote:I think you'll find the latter only stepped out of the shadows and became a director when a group of local well respected people had been agreed to join the board. The decision had been made by the old board to allow Barry Ward, Derek Jones etc on to the board and this included a drains up review of finances and the NW project. Then strangely after the leaving the meeting the next day a totally different statement was agreed was released and the deal was off. The also had a new director who was the self proclaimed Project Leader. Then when it was clear any challenge to the board from these rebels was over he left the board. Worcester News had been given all the evidence at the time and chose to do nothing with it and took the SAFE route over and over again. Only now that the new board have distanced themselves from the former have the WN decided to do a 180 degree turn. DISGRACEFUL!!!
Avante wrote:Dave Boddy was certainly out of his depth with the negotiations, both with Careys & St Modwen, but any agreement he made with SMD must have been run passed or approved by the project leader, David Hallmark.
They can't, the board is contractually obliged to work with SMD, and put every reasonable endeavour into the Nunnery Way plan. We have a situation where the contractual agreements are forcing the Directors to operate in a way that is detrimental to the business, that can't be right. However the cost of challenging contractual agreements could run into six figures! SMD have WCFC by the short and curlies, thanks to the amazing negotiating skills of David Boddy! The club is in total turmoil, and I personally would take the administration route, if only to break these contracts!
Why did an experienced local solicitor let the club, of which he was a director, enter such a punative contract?
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find your next job now In Worcestershire and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Worcestershire now!
Search Now »
Worcestershire homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Worcestershire
Search Now »
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with