City and St Modwen agree new plan for Nunnery Way stadium (From Worcester News)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
City and St Modwen agree new plan for Nunnery Way stadium
6:30pm Friday 8th July 2011 in Sport
City chairman Anthony Hampson.
Worcester City have performed a dramatic U-turn and are now committed to taking the club debt-free to Nunnery Way.
Last October, the St George’s Lane outfit stated they could not afford a move with property developer St Modwen and withdrew their support for the planning application to Worcester City Council.
However, with no way out of the contract inherited from Dave Boddy’s regime, which ties them to such a move until 2017, the club’s board, under chairman Anthony Hampson, have been forced into a major re-think.
They now believe they have found a way of bridging the £1.5million funding gap to build a stadium to Blue Square Bet North standard in time for when they leave the Lane in June 2013.
The plan is still to construct a scaled-down 556-seat main stand, and a 1,600 covered terrace behind one goal, with a total capacity of 3,226.
St Modwen have submitted those revisions to Guildhall officials but the cost will be greatly reduced from around £2million to £600,000.
This will be achieved by using modular materials — prefabricated buildings — and City are hopeful of changing the materials if planning permission is granted.
A pedestrian crossing instead of a footbridge over the dual carriageway is also now part of the plans.
Infrastructure remains at £1.26m, leaving the club with an overall bill of just over £1.8m — significantly reduced from the £3.26m quoted just nine months ago.
It will be funded by money left from selling the Lane to Careys New Homes — around £1.5m — while City will also apply to the Football Foundation for a £150,000 grant.
Notably, there will also be a £500,000 advance from St Modwen on enabling profits from offices and car showrooms the firm plan for the 20-acre site.
Although effectively a loan, City would only have to pay the money back if their share of enabling profit went over £500,000, plus any interest accrued between 2013 and when St Modwen eventually build.
The St George’s Lane club are also planning to embark on a fund-raising programme to replace the modular structures with brick buildings later down the line.
Vice-chairman Andrew Watson said City had explored “every avenue” and believed this was “the best practical solution” to keep football in Worcester and avoid a future ground-share.
A statement explained: “A series of meetings have taken place between the club and St Modwen over the last few months.
“During this process, investigations have led to a review into how the new football stadium could be delivered through the use of modular method construction techniques which can lead to significant savings that can be integrated into the scheme.
“This can be achieved while still complying with the ground grading regulations and providing facilities comparable with other clubs in the Football Conference.
“This can take place without compromise to the green and sustainable ambitions contained in the planning application.
“Following these discussions with St Modwen, we now feel able to report, as a board, that we can deliver a vibrant economically viable, debt-free, football club for the city of Worcester.”
Comments(5)
fairly sober
says...
7:45pm Fri 8 Jul 11
However, if it does work someone deserves the credit.
"Arise Sir Anthony" would be appropriate.
mooster
says...
9:11am Sat 9 Jul 11
High Time
says...
9:34am Sat 9 Jul 11
artridge and Prescot they should all hang there heads in shame. And not forgetting a local Solicitor and club Director who was advising them also as lot to answer for.
Doogie 46
says...
4:41pm Sat 9 Jul 11
I am puzzled as to why the original unaffordable stadium is still doing the rounds, reported only a couple of days ago as being rejected by Warndon Parish Council on grounds of pedestrian issues.
I aim no criticism at the current board - the Boddy regime left them with nowhere to go until 2017 -but I`m not sure City are any closer to a new stadium of any description.
However, if it all DOES work out Mr Hampson and his directors will deserve sainthoods at the very least.
The_Real_Brooksider
says...
10:17am Thu 14 Jul 11
WCFC have entered into binding contracts that effectively force them to buy the land for £600,000 - non-negotiable. In order to accomodate a football ground, it has been designed to the lowest possible cost and size. Phase 1 consists of a small stand - it doesnt stretch the length of one side, there will be half the seats than at St. Georges Lane. There will be just one standing area behind one goal. Thats it, thats the lot!! In order to fund this Phase 1, WCFC will be reliant upon additional funding in the form of "overage" to the tune of £1.4 million according to the Business Plan. It states "The overagegenerated from the sale by St Modwen of freehold or leasehold interests on the 15 acre site will, IF ACHIEVED,meet the shortfall in funding. So here's the issue. The shortfall will be from Day 1, yet SMD are at this stage only applying for OUTLINE planning consent for the 15 acres, and it is possible, nay probably , that overage payments will not be due for two years or more, if at all! So how does the football club fund the shortfall of £1.4 million on phase 1? Because of this shortfall, there is little chance of Phase 2 ever coming to fruition, but why should SMD care about that? Phase 1 has no scope for off-field revenue generation, so the football club will expected to try and raise funding from a ground smaller than St. Georges Lane, which will not even meet the grading requirements for the Conference.
SMD have got Worcester City Football Club right where they want them, damned if they do, and damned if they don't!
Worcester City Council have no obligation to protect the interests of private companies, but they do have an obligation to protect the interests of community sporting organisations such as the Citys premier football club. They must stand up to the bully boys at SMD and reject this speculative retail development application and ensure a future for the football club.

Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with