Refs say sorry for late penalty blunder that cost Warriors victory

WRONG CALL: Referee JP Doyle wrongly awarded a penalty against Warriors that cost them a derby victory over Gloucester last Saturday. WRONG CALL: Referee JP Doyle wrongly awarded a penalty against Warriors that cost them a derby victory over Gloucester last Saturday.

WITH Worcester’s Aviva Premiership season just three games old, the Sixways club have already received their second apology from refereeing chiefs.

In both of Warriors’ home games so far this term, they have been cost victory by poor officiating, which has twice led to Ed Morrison, the Rugby Football Union’s head of elite referee development, having to hold his hands up on behalf of his men with the whistle.

On Saturday, Gloucester snatched a 16-16 draw when JP Doyle wrongly awarded a scrum penalty to the visitors with the clock on zero, which followed on from Luke Pearce mistakenly penalising Worcester for off-side against Bath, which allowed Olly Barkley to secure a 24-23 win for his side.

However, following both matches, Warriors have been contacted by refereeing bosses to admit their officials had made incorrect — not to mention costly — calls.

“We have lost one game and drawn another when we should have won both on the basis of a wrong decision from the officials,” Warriors head coach Richard Hill fumed.

“It’s a high-pressure job for referees and it is so difficult to do – they have to make some big calls and we’ve been the victim of two disappointing ones already.

“Unfortunately, we’ve had another apology from the referees’ department this week.

“The last penalty against Gloucester shouldn’t have been awarded, but again that doesn’t help us now.

“On Monday morning, I was very hard on our front row for conceding that penalty, but it has been checked out by a lot of the experts and they said, ‘actually, that should not have been a penalty’.

“Ed is in charge of the referees, along with Brian Campsall, and they were at Sixways yesterday morning, and we had a good open dialogue.

“Apparently, they showed the scrum in question to Graham Rowntree, asked what he would have done and I’m led to believe he would have given the penalty the other way.

“They then came to us and said, ‘that was a mistake, we apologise’. That doesn’t help me or the team too much when we’ve lost, though.”

Hill added: “All the referees have been in the same room and they will have looked at two decisions at Sixways against Bath and Gloucester and they’ve seen Worcester have been hard done by.

“So, in the back of their minds, they will now think carefully as to what big decisions they will make against us.”

Comments(4)

Robot 3021 says...
11:31am Fri 21 Sep 12

Apologising for refereeing decisions sets a bad precedent in my opinion.

If Richard Hill was hard on his front row for conceding the penalty on the Monday morning, and it then took a number of "experts" many views of video replays (no doubt in slow motion) to conclude that it shouldn't have been a penalty, then the referee is hardly to blame.

He made a judgement call in real time, based on a Gloucester scrum that had been dominating, going forward and through a collapsing Warriors scrum. There is so much going on at scrum time you could almost certainly award a penalty to either side at pretty much every scrum if you decided to analyse it through video replays.

Trust the officials and back them, "mistakes" even out over games and over seasons, I'm sure I could go through the video and highlight three or four calls in the game that went Worcester's way when they shouldn't have or were marginal at best, but as they weren't at the end of the game they don't get this ridiculous microscopic inspection.

deano220 says...
2:08pm Fri 21 Sep 12

fully agree with Robot 3021 comments, a decision was made at an emotive time on a scrum, which could have gone either way, apology accepted and move on.
My take would be hugely different ....... Why was there a scrum in the first place. If Richard hill wants to rant at the team lets rant at the taking of the ball at this crucial moment. We could have surrounded the jumper with 10 players, taken the ball safely, rucked safely and kicked it out, job dome and win secured. Lets not get bamboozled by clever spin, we lost this because we didn't catch the ball, the scrum and subsequent penalty was just a formality, lets have less smoke and mirrors and more up front honesty.

mrpete28 says...
10:32pm Fri 21 Sep 12

Refereeing decisions in the last minute of the game, however heartbreaking at the time, would have been totally irrelevant had we been 4 points in front. As far as apologising for bad decisions why not? Isn't making mistakes and having the gumption to recognise that one has, part of the reason rugby is in a different place to other professional sports?

Guy66 says...
11:23pm Sat 22 Sep 12

The game was on TV, why could they not refer to a TMO before awarding such a relevant penalty?

click2find

Get Adobe Flash player
About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree