Take Pride Headlines RSS Feed


We're to blame for gull menace - video

GULLIBLE: Andy Staples of Red Kite Pest Control swaps the gulls’ eggs to fool the birds in order to control the population. (28042205) GULLIBLE: Andy Staples of Red Kite Pest Control swaps the gulls’ eggs to fool the birds in order to control the population. (28042205) Buy this photo »

LITTER is not just unappealing on the eye, but draws some of the biggest pests to Worcester.

And the most visible of the pests are the seagulls, which swoop down on every morsel of food they see. The Take Pride in Worcester campaign, launched this week by your Worcester News in conjunction with Worcester City Council and VisitWorcester, wants to highlight what a difference you can make by just putting your rubbish in a bin rather than dropping it on the floor.

Louise Pedersen, of the RSPB, says: “Over the past decades we’ve been seeing more herring and lesser black-backed gulls coming into towns all over the UK, including here in Worcester.

“Whatever we might think of them, they are very intelligent and resourceful, and they are drawn in by the prospects of finding easily available food, including litter. If gulls are a problem for public health, then the most effective measure to discourage gulls from nesting in our towns is to reduce the availability of food from streets and landfill sites, and to make it less attractive for them to nest on roofs by as using physical barriers.”

In Worcester there are 467 nesting pairs of seagulls of which 310 can be found in the city centre, where food is easiest to come by. The job of trying to control the population for the past five years had been done by Andy Staples, owner of Red Kite Pest Control.

And Mr Staples agrees that the ease with which food is available is definitely contributing to the seagull problem.

“They are very adaptable,” he said. “We find all sorts of rubbish up here. Their eyesight is seven times better than ours, so they will see if you drop a chip on the street. It all provides them with food.”

And the roofs of Worcester are proof of this. Among the nests are hundreds of chicken bones – some poached from the landfills, but others clearly left-overs from somebody’s takeaway.

But Mr Staples is working hard to make sure the seagulls, which damage buildings and can become agressive, increase no further. Last year, he managed to reduce the numbers in the city centre humanely by two per cent, by swapping their own eggs with fake ones which he has adapted to look and feel like the real things.

It is the very latest in population control, but requires time and a head for heights – Mr Staples looks after 43 properties and their roofs.

And while Mr Staples is at the cutting edge of seagull population control, residents can help by simply throwing their rubbish in a bin.

To report a grot spot to the council call 01905 722 101. The authority promises to have it cleaned up within two working days.
• Click here for more on the Take Pride campaign and to upload your own grot spot pictures.

Comments(8)

Jabbadad says...
10:42am Thu 15 Jul 10

I understood from a councillor responsible for these flying vermin, that they (the council) are restricted by yet another silly animal rights law, as to how they cull these gulls. One method was to take the eggs, dip them in liquid parrafine (which makes them infertile) and replace them in the nest.
I am sure however that if the gulls became neighbours of those who would protect any animals brigade they would understand that perhaps they are wrong, and the gulls must go.
When thoughtless take away customers from Mac donalds Blackpole, were eating their food in their cars parked in the nearbye carparks, having eaten what they wanted, just opening their car doors and leaving the waste on the floor, which in turn provided easy food for both the gulls and the rats from the nearbye canal. In the mornings you could see 20 to 30+ fast food bags left behind. I also must add that it was encumbant on MacDonalds to clear up after they were closed.

Malvern says...
12:50pm Thu 15 Jul 10

Worcester road in Malvern outside Dominos Pizza is a disgrace. The kids drop the rubbish as they think they will look like a wimp if they bin it in front of their mates. It's the same kind of dumb thinking that makes they walk slowly across the road in front of traffic. (duh)

Marant says...
1:16pm Thu 15 Jul 10

There is no legislative reason that black-backed gulls (both species) and herring gulls can't be killed by an authorised person (normally the land-owner, occupier or their operative). These species are three of the eleven that are derogated and not protected by the Wildlife and Countryside Act. Even the nests can be removed.
.
Shooting them or removing the nests is only a short term cure, as more move in or they rebuild the nest. The idea behind replacing the eggs/dipping them in chemicals, is that the seagulls keep trying to hatch them (unsuccessfully), and don't lay more.
.
Unfortunately a 2% reduction in population over 2 years (=approx 6 breeding pairs in the town centre) could be the result of natural variation.
.
Might be worth trying a big cull in conjunction with the egg replacement? But difficult to cull in town as shooting not an option (discharge of firearms in a built up environment rather difficult) and poisoning can be cruel (and therefore banned - they might be derogated species, but cruelty is another issue) and will always result in rotting dead birds everywhere. Not so good.
.
I don't know if anyone has tried contraception laced food?

rgdudley says...
1:21pm Thu 15 Jul 10

"I don't know if anyone has tried contraception laced food?"
.
For the gulls or the litter louts? :)

Marant says...
1:23pm Thu 15 Jul 10

There is no legislative reason that black-backed gulls (both species) and herring gulls can't be killed by an authorised person (normally the land-owner, occupier or their operative). These species are three of the eleven that are derogated and not protected by the Wildlife and Countryside Act. Even the nests can be removed.
.
Shooting them or removing the nests is only a short term cure, as more move in or they rebuild the nest. The idea behind replacing the eggs/dipping them in chemicals, is that the seagulls keep trying to hatch them (unsuccessfully), and don't lay more.
.
Unfortunately a 2% reduction in population over 2 years (=approx 6 breeding pairs in the town centre) could be the result of natural variation.
.
Might be worth trying a big cull in conjunction with the egg replacement? But difficult to cull in town as shooting not an option (discharge of firearms in a built up environment rather difficult) and poisoning can be cruel (and therefore banned - they might be derogated species, but cruelty is another issue) and will always result in rotting dead birds everywhere. Not so good.
.
I don't know if anyone has tried contraception laced food?

Luckymummy says...
1:59pm Thu 15 Jul 10

How about stopping those mad old women from throwing buckets of bird seed all over the street??! There's always a great pile of it next to the Angel Chef and I saw several near H & M and NEXT the other day.

Andy Red Kite says...
3:52pm Sat 24 Jul 10

To reply to a few of the comments posted on this interesting subject;

It is true that authorised persons (eg pest control) can "control" certain species of birds under the relevant General Licence of The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. However, after Natural England produced a consultation document last year, the terms of the General Licences have now changed from January this year. Great Black-backed gulls now have complete protection including eggs, nests and birds. Herring Gulls now have partial protection and the birds cannot now be killed but we are still allowed to treat eggs and nests. Only the Lesser Black-backed gulls can now be "controlled".

The 2% reduction in the city centre population of nesting gulls needs to be viewed in context. Without any population control, an urban gull breeding colony would normally increase by at least 18% per year. This takes into account natural recruitment, mortality and declining fertility. Therefore a reduction of 2% is actually a reduction of 20% in real terms and is unlikely to be a result of natural variation.

Contraception laced food is an interesting method of control and research is ongoing but the logistics of its application on a city wide scale would not be straightforward. The use of dummy eggs in my view is still the best method of contraception we have at our disposal.

christopherO says...
10:21am Thu 12 Aug 10

I am moving from Bristol where, living on the harbourside for 20 years, I have experienced a gull plague followed, now, by peace from the pests and the return of a mass of small garden birds.

Yes, food waste is the major contributor - Bristol put a lot into warning people and now fine up to £1,000 for dropping food litter in areas especially around cafes and other food establishments.

There were two other measures that had impact.

Across the harbour from my home a man would go to the top of an office building early each morning with a large bird of prey and display it causing the gulls to go into panic - we saw the gull numbers fall away dramatically during this time.

Also eggs were treated and breeding severely restricted.

Everyone must take this seriously inclusing the woman who was in my wife's office and would open the window when gulls tapped on the glass and feed them because they asked .... she didn't seem to understand why they went to her particular window!

Education is vital - don't blame ignorant people - talk to them and get them to understand. Only then, if the persist - fine them!!

Bristol harbouside is now almost totally free of gulls and the messy droppings in my garden cleared up. Wonderful.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree