MOHAMED Ali, of Bromyard Road, Worcester, admitted racially / religiously aggravated intentional harassment / alarm / distress - words / writing, two charges of assault by beating of an emergency worker and using threatening / abusive / insulting words / behaviour to cause harassment / alarm / distress.
The 39-year-old committed the offences on March 26 this year in Worcester.
Ali was ordered to pay compensation of £50 to both officers, fined £291, £116 victim surcharge and costs of £185.
KEIRAN RIDLEY, of London Road, Worcester, denied a charge of outraging public decency.
The 39-year-old is accused of performing a sex act in a church in Worcester on June 25.
Ridley was told to attend the next hearing of the case at Birmingham Magistrates Court on October 4.
Ridley was given conditional bail with requirements not to enter or attend any place of worship unless this is specifically to attend a support group meeting
CARL CHANDLER, 46, of Windermere Drive, Worcester, admitted possession of a knife/sharp pointed article in a public place.
The court heard Chandler had the knife, a yellow stanley knife, in Cranham Drive on August 20.
Chandler was jailed for four months, suspended for a year.
He was also ordered to pay costs of £135 and victim surcharge of £185.
ROY FRANKUM, of Broadway Road, Childswickham, Broadway, admitted drink driving and having no insurance.
The court heard the 35-year-old drove a Vauxhall Corsa on Broadway Road when he had 49mcg of alcohol in 100ml of breath.
The offence was committed on August 31 this year - police also finding he had no insurance.
Frankum was disqualified from driving for a year, but was offered the chance to do the drink-drive awareness course to reduce the ban length.
Frankum was fined £173 and told to pay £135 costs, £69 victim surcharge.
JAMES REYNOLDS, of Copcut Hill, Droitwich, admitted Criminal damage.
The 31-year-old committed the offence on September 3 this year - Reynolds destroying multiple garden decorations and children's toys.
The defendant was told to pay £600 compensation and fined £120.
He was also ordered to pay £135 costs and £48 victim surcharge.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article