Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting WN NEWS to 80360 or e-mail us
2:44pm Tuesday 23rd August 2011 in Read
SIR – Re Councillor [Alan] Amos’s letter on seagulls ‘Why was seagull case brought to court? (Worcester News, August 16).
Will he please re-read what he has written? Can he not understand that the problem of mess is not the fault of the seagulls, not even the fast food outlets.
It is entirely the fault of the people who throw the food onto the ground in the first place. If they stopped dropping the food the seagulls would go away and the noise and mess would stop.
Instead of urging the council to spend money on getting rid of seagulls, why doesn’t he educate his constituents about decent behaviour and stop them dropping litter in the first place, it is, after all, an offence. Perhaps a surveillance camera could help catch the culprits. Surely this would be a better use of public money.
If we are to follow the flawed reasoning of Councillor Amos, are we to conclude that all animals that make a mess are to be destroyed?
Could he let us know where his constituents figure in this argument?
Helen Smart
Worcester
Comments(4)
tub_thumper
says...
10:34am Wed 24 Aug 11
Jabbadad
says...
12:25pm Wed 24 Aug 11
tub_thumper
says...
7:59pm Wed 24 Aug 11
Berrowsman
says...
9:40am Fri 26 Aug 11
Find your next job now In Worcestershire and beyond
Search Now »
Make a date in Worcestershire now!
Search Now »
Worcestershire homes for sale and to let
Search Now »
Cars for sale throughout Worcestershire
Search Now »
Comment now! Register or sign in below.
Log in with us
Fields marked with * are mandatory.
Or
Log in with