Read RSS Feed


All this mess is not the fault of seagulls

SIR – Re Councillor [Alan] Amos’s letter on seagulls ‘Why was seagull case brought to court? (Worcester News, August 16).

Will he please re-read what he has written? Can he not understand that the problem of mess is not the fault of the seagulls, not even the fast food outlets.

It is entirely the fault of the people who throw the food onto the ground in the first place. If they stopped dropping the food the seagulls would go away and the noise and mess would stop.

Instead of urging the council to spend money on getting rid of seagulls, why doesn’t he educate his constituents about decent behaviour and stop them dropping litter in the first place, it is, after all, an offence. Perhaps a surveillance camera could help catch the culprits. Surely this would be a better use of public money.

If we are to follow the flawed reasoning of Councillor Amos, are we to conclude that all animals that make a mess are to be destroyed?

Could he let us know where his constituents figure in this argument?

Helen Smart
Worcester

Comments(4)

tub_thumper says...
10:34am Wed 24 Aug 11

Don't expect a reply from him, Helen. I have already argued against his letter to which he gave no reply. Also, a letter from Simon McCullough reveals no response from him also.
.
The guy just decided to have a good rant, at a whim. He did not realise how silly and uneducated it has made him look.

Jabbadad says...
12:25pm Wed 24 Aug 11

Yes I support the views that litter dropped is a big cause of the flying vermin (seagulls) and campaigned for the fast food take away outlets on Blackpole to clean up the car parks after the late night car diners had eaten then just opened the car doors and left the remains on the floor. These outlets being close to a canal could well have encouraged rats and the like. Now this problem has been partly addressed the seagulls over Blackpole still swarm around in quite large and getting larger flocks scavenging and giving an Arial bombardment of droppings over anything, anyone, unfortunate to be under their flight path.
As to the seaside gulls they are just as much a nuisance by strutting among the visitors and dive bombing small children and stealing the very food / ice creams etc out of their hands. So yes they need culling, but the councils hands are tied by the so-called bird lovers. I recall the council had to turn down a previous offer by a man with a hunting Hawk / Kestrel, whose very presence would have driven the seagulls away. And now established they are prolific breeders. So I would like to hear a cure from the bird lovers which will address the numbers of flying vermin already here?

tub_thumper says...
7:59pm Wed 24 Aug 11

Jabbadad, I don’t understand your contradictive view. You make as much sense as councillor Amos!
.
Bird lovers!? Has nothing to do with being a bird lover. It has, on the other hand, something to do with respecting all walks of life. We as people are the biggest vermin going.
.
My answer to your question? Stop throwing away and wasting food and stop over fishing the sea and then the gulls won’t move in land, thus, preventing some useless city councillor from condoning animal cruelty as a quick fix for a solution to a problem that was created years ago by our own kind!

Berrowsman says...
9:40am Fri 26 Aug 11

Why don`t we stop "growing" our human population and turn Worcester into an enormous bird sanctuary with Tub Thumper as warden?

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree